About Me

Name: Daniel Sauerwein
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

President Alan Keyes?

With Romney out and Huckabee having less of a chance, it now looks like John McCain will be the Republican nominee. Unfortunately, this places me into a precarious situation, as I do not know how I can exercise my right and responsibility as a citizen and vote. I refuse to vote for either Hillary or Obama because Hillary just flat scares me as a president and Obama lacks experience and is too liberal for my taste. I also do not feel that I can vote for McCain, as while I feel that he would not be as bad as either Democrat, I also fear that it will pave the way for liberal control of our nation for years to come. Earlier this week, I noted that I did not vote for Alan Keyes because I knew that he stood no chance and wanted to ensure a Romney victory, which did happen here in ND. Now that Romney is out, the situation for the convention could be one of many uncommitted delegates, which has the potential to save our party. That is why I would like to throw my support behind Alan Keyes.

I have been impressed with Keyes for years and know that he has the experience and conservative values that can keep our nation strong. He was a part of the Reagan administration and is a very eloquent speaker. I would like to encourage you to visit Keyes' website and learn more about him and support him as best possible. To all uncommitted or Romney delegates, please throw your support behind Keyes and elect a real conservative. Do not be fooled by Ron Paul supporters that claim he is the only Goldwater conservative because remember that Goldwater wanted to kick Communist tail, whereas Paul would make us into a isolationistic weak nation.

Conservatives, if we all get behind Alan Keyes, we can hopefully avoid a Hillary presidency (sorry, but Obama is not going to be the nominee) and strengthen our nation. Join me in supporting Alan Keyes.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A tale of two caucuses

I love North Dakota! Not only because most of my extended family lives here, or that I can conceal carry if I choose, but because I can participate in their caucus while not being a resident. As a student, I am allowed to retain my permanent residency and I am proud to be a resident of the 19th Congressional District of the State of Illinois (go John Shimkus). However, living over 900 miles from home does present some challenges with regard to exercising my voting rights. I was unable to get a chance to request an absentee ballot for the Illinois primary and was set to spend my evening with friends.

Well, I did spend the evening with friends, but also voted. I planned to attend the Republican caucus in Grand Forks with two of my buddies who are ND residents, as I had never been to a caucus and wanted to see what one was like. When we got to the entrance, one of my friends suggested that we get our student ID cards out. I did and to my surprise was told that I could participate as a non-resident. After making sure several times that my participation in the caucus would not prevent me from voting absentee in my home district in Illinois, I cast my ballot for . . . Gov. Romney. I have been struggling for a long time over which Republican I support. I liked both Duncan Hunter and Fred Thompson, but since they dropped out, I was torn between McCain and Romney (Ron Paul scares me as much and Hillary and Obama), but finally decided thanks to some last minute campaigning from one of my friends who follows politics a bit more closely than I do and has been keeping track of the issues with regard to both candidates. I have been leery of McCain anyway given his stance against the President and his policies on illegal immigration and my friends last-minute stating of areas I was suspicious about but had not paid attention to sealed the deal for Romney. One note, while Alan Keyes was on the ballot and I would love him to be the Republican nominee, I had to vote for someone that at least had a chance.

All in all, I had fun at the Republican caucus and hope to experience that again. After leaving the caucus, we decided to check out the other side and have a little fun. One of the caucus sites for the Democrats was (big surprise) on campus. This is smart on the part of Democrats, as what better way to get young people to vote, especially if you are the Obama campaign than to have a site right on campus. As much as I wanted to crash the event, I stayed professional and possibly even awed some of the local Obama people when I told them I was from Illinois (I did not mention that I can't stand the guy's politics, which would have gotten me tarred and feathered). We grabbed a couple of Obama posters and headed up to look at the caucus room, which was fairly quiet mainly because the Dem. caucus had been open since 2:00PM.

Overall, Super Tuesday, though cold, was fun here in North Dakota. Given that Obama has won on the Democratic side, we now wait the Republican results and I hope they bode well for Romney. I hope that everyone else had a great Super Tuesday and since it is also Fat Tuesday, please be safe while out partying.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Academic Traitors: Thoughts on David Horowitz’s The Professors

A question to all you parents out there. What would you do if you found out your child’s college professor advocated the killing of white people? advocated pedophilia? was a convicted terrorist? Unfortunately, too many parents find out too late that their child has encountered at least one (probably more) tenured radical at the college they attend that is represented by the above questions. Is this what you spend $20,000+ a year for, for your child to be threatened, harassed, or indoctrinated by someone who holds radical views that you may not want your young adult child exposed to? I do not think so. Fortunately, a former 1960s radical (former Communist) has exposed some of the worst of the worst of the tenured radicals that now infest many campuses across America with their venom of liberal vitriol.

David Horowitz is that man. Horowitz, a man raised in a Communist neighborhood by Communist parents, has turned from his radical ways and now speaks out against those whom he associated with in the 1960s. His latest book The Professors: The 101 Most Dangerous Academics in America profiles dozens of professors, who range from convicted terrorists, to anti-Semites, to the bizarre.

Horowitz begins the work with an introduction detailing the scandal over the invitation of Ward Churchill to speak at Hamilton College and the problems facing higher education with regard to these radicals. Then he begins the profiles of one hundred professors. Many of these “educators” are charlatans, with some teaching outside their fields, others being promoted above their qualifications (most people with a master’s degree can not be a professor, but for left-wing loons, we’ll make an exception). Others espouse such controversial statements that it is amazing how they are still working, as if anyone else said some of those things, they would be fired.

He profiles persons who have expressed their hatred for whites, conservatives, Jews, Christians, etc. Some of the faculty are chairs, administrators of centers, even if they do not possess the required degrees or experience, but they do possess the correct liberal world view. Some professors have criminal pasts, from bombings to rape, but yet they are qualified to teach your children. When you read this book, you may get angry or sick at the clowns that are allowed to teach that are profiled in this book.

Horowitz then discusses the hiring practices at most colleges and universities, noting how insulated the academy is from oversight. He describes situations in which most committees hire people just like themselves, which only makes the problem of tenured radicals worse. Horowitz also notes how those who attempt to remedy the problem are swiftly dealt with. The case he cites for this is the Lawrence Summers case at Harvard. Summers, former president of Harvard attempted to fix these issues at his university. He first earned the ire of his faculty when he criticized Cornell West, a noted black radical professor, who writes rap music and puts out nothing of value as far as a professor is concerned. West ended up leaving, much to the dismay of West’s fellow radicals. Then, Summers put the nail in his coffin when he dared to consider that other factors beyond socialization might account for more men than women being in high-end sciences and engineering positions (heaven forbid we accept that men and women are DIFFERENT). Summers ultimately faced the radicals on his faculty, particularly feminists, who were outraged by these events. These faculty members gave Summers a vote of no confidence and forced him to resign his position.

Ultimately, Horowitz has written a great book that is an important resource for parents, alumni, conservative faculty and administration, and prospective students to understand the radicals teaching at many institutions around the country. Parents can use this book to know potential radical threats to their children and prevent them from suffering with them. Alumni can use the book to place pressure on their alma mater to get rid of these radicals. Conservative faculty and administration can use the book to understand their radical colleagues better and fight them effectively. Finally, prospective students can use the book as a guide to understanding what they may face on campus and how to survive. There are many great resources for college-bound people and David Horowitz’s book The Professors should be one of these resources.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A New Cold War?

The rise of Red China (yes, I use that term because China is communist), the rise of socialist/communist Venezuela, the threat of Russia led by Putin, in an eerie potential reconstruction of the Soviet Union. It all makes one wonder if we are entering a new Cold War. I would argue that we have been in a Cold War type situation for a few years now. We have witnessed the rise of Red China and its willingness to flex its muscle against its Asian neighbors and not considered it a threat. In addition, we ignored the threat of Islamofascism until it was too late and we experienced 9/11. While we are in a “hot war” with Islamofascism (though our level of commitment as a nation sometimes makes me wonder, except for our brave men and women who have served in the War on Terror and understand what we face), it seems that we are not doing enough to combat the threats of Red China, Socialist Venezuela, and Russia, even though these three nations are hindering our efforts in the War on Terror and even financing our enemies.

I fear that our resolve is not as strong in this new Cold War-style situation as it was during the real Cold War. President Bush is not Ronald Reagan and America is not as united as it should be. The time has come for the United States to elect a man that personifies Ronald Reagan for our generation and take the fight to these new threats, as well as Islamofascism. We need to rebuild our military to combat our enemies, and, have a leader with the skills to use it effectively, but have the ability, as Reagan did, to use diplomacy, but back it up with enough force to achieve what is in our interests. We need a new doctrine of “Peace through strength” for the 21st century. It is only through our resolve and an expanded military that we will avoid a potential disastrous conflagration with one or all three of those nations. Let us stand together and stand up against the forces of evil and make sure that they will end up on the “ash heap of history.”

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

California Congressman Goes Off Deep End

Rep. Peter Stark (D-CA) has officially sunk to a new low. The California Democrat actually said the following on the House floor:

“You don’t have money to fund the war or children. But you’re going to spend it to blow up innocent people if we can get enough kids to grow old enough for you to send to Iraq to get their heads blown off for the president’s amusement.”

Watch the video, courtesy of Breitbart TV here

Yes, you read (and heard) correctly. Pete Stark accused Republicans of sending troops to Iraq to get killed “for the president’s amusement.” This is the height of irresponsibility from Democrats. What message does this send to our troops and their families?

According to Fox News, the White House is staying away, choosing not to dignify this with a response. Rep. Charles Rangel, Democrat from New York, mentioned the possibility of a rebuke for Stark. I do not feel that this is enough, but with the Pelosi House, I will be surprised if Stark even gets a rebuke. Speech as vile as this should warrant a censure at least. According to Stark’s website, a press release states that he apologized, but no news source appears to have corroborated this. The press release said the following:

“I have nothing but respect for our brave men and women in uniform and wish them the very best,” said Stark. “But I respect neither the Commander-in-Chief who keeps them in harms way nor the chickenhawks in Congress who vote to deny children health care.”

It must be noted that this is not the first time Stark has gone off the deep end and insulted our troops. According to Breitbart TV, in May of 2004 stark berated Staff Sgt. Daniel Dowd, a member of the California National Guard, VFW life member, and American Legion member, after Dowd faxed Stark complaining about Stark’s vote over prisoner abuse. Stark questioned Dowd’s intelligence and personally insulted him over the answering machine.

Click here to listen to the audio.

Peter Stark, I ask that you rectify this situation by doing the following: 1. Retract your remarks; 2. Apologize on the floor of the House to the President, House members, Senators, and the American people; 3. Issue a written apology to the families of each and every service member killed, wounded, or serving in Iraq and Afghanistan, begging for their forgiveness; and 4. Resign your seat, as you lack the responsibility or intellect to serve as a member of Congress. Your remarks are shameful, hateful, show clear lack of judgment, and border on treason as defined by the Constitution.

I encourage all persons living in Stark’s district to contact his office and express your outrage (contact details below) over his remarks. To all Americans who have lost loved ones in this war and were offended by Stark’s comments, rest assured you have my support and thanks, as well as those of most other Americans. Take comfort that people like Stark are in the small minority and that most of us support you and your loved ones who sacrificed so much for our nation. To those currently serving, thank you for your service and do not let Stark deter you from your mission, as you are better people than he is.

To contact Congressman Pete Stark:
Click here to email Stark, if you live in the 13th district

Washington, DC office contact information:
239 Cannon Building
Washington, DC 20515
202-225-5065
202-226-3805 (fax)

Fremont, CA office contact information:
39300 Civic Center Dr.
Suite 220
Fremont, CA 94538
510-494-1388
510-494-5852 (fax)

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Way to go Rush!

Well, the auction of the infamous whiny letter by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has ended and many kids will benefit because of his liberal lunacy. Rush Limbaugh auctioned the letter off on Ebay with the proceeds to go to the Marine Corps Law Enforcement Foundation. The Foundation will receive 4.2 million dollars to provide scholarships to the children of Marines and federal law enforcement officers killed in the line of duty.

The winning bid was $2.1 million placed by Betty Casey of the Eugene B. Casey Foundation. Casey has been a long-time listener of Limbaugh’s program. As promised, Rush will match the winning bid in a donation to the Foundation. The letter in question was sent earlier this month to the CEO of Clear Channel, which airs Rush’s program demanding that Rush be reprimanded for his “phony soldiers” remark, in which he blasted those who faked their service records to claim they were in Iraq and opposed to the war. Senate Democrats wasted taxpayer money on this witch hunt over nothing and Limbaugh turned it into something positive.

Read the letter here, courtesy of Rush.

In addition to the letter itself, Betty Casey will receive the Halliburton case the letter was secured in, a letter of thanks from Rush, and a picture of him announcing the auction. I encourage all Democrats who signed this letter to take Rush’s challenge and donate to the Foundation and truly show your support for our troops. Rush, the Conservative Files thanks you for all that you do for conservatism and for this charity auction to benefit the children of some of our nation’s heroes.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Second Amendment Under Siege

Update (Oct. 20, 2007):  There has been an important development in this story. I have learned that the supposed meeting was actually a misprint and am now correcting the record in order to maintain credibility with you my readers. My apologies, but we were under the impression that as of late yesterday that the original story was the case.

Well, I have been thinking about what to write about and decided to tackle an issue close to home. The institution of higher learning that I now attend (the University of North Dakota) has now decided that its older students that reside in campus apartments, many of whom have families, are not responsible or mature enough to have firearms within their apartment units. The campus housing authorities have sunk to new lows with this issue and, as a proud conservative who believes strongly in the right to keep and bear arms, I can no longer remain silent.

Let me first state for the record that I do not live on campus (and have no desire to with this new policy, even though I do not currently own a weapon), but that I am standing alongside my friends and colleagues that will be adversely affected by this draconian example of college officials demonstrating a knee-jerk reaction to the Virginia Tech tragedy.

This story originates at the end of September when one of my colleagues and friends (I will omit their names for now) discovered the weapons ban proposal by the University's Apartment Community Council (ACC) buried in an innocuous email that most people would delete if nothing in the subject caught their eye. The email mentioned that there would be a forum on Tues. Oct. 2 to discuss the ban. With only around a week to prepare, my friends organized and came out strong to the forum to express their concerns over the proposal. The pro-ban side was small compared to those against and my friends and their supporters were able to tear apart the University Police Chief's arguments easily and civilly. The overall argument for the ban is continuity, but what is good for the goose (undergraduates living in dormitories in a more close and intimate setting) may not be good for the gander (older, typically graduate-level, students who often have a spouse and child). While it is true that weapons are banned in all other campus facilities, the apartments are an appropriate exception given the nature of apartment living and the demographics of most people living in them.

We left the forum with confidence, but caution as well, as we knew that the battle to safeguard the Second Amendment rights of apartment residents was just starting. We also knew that we had seriously annoyed the pro-ban housing administrative staff, who were likely expecting to quietly pass the ban by hiding it in an email that no one would read. 

This lead to what happened earlier today. One of my colleagues and I were in a computer lab working on an assignment, when he checked a quick message that he received to his Facebook account. The message was from one of our supporters stating that they had uncovered that UND Housing held a meeting and did not publicize it (my friends had been paying closer attention to their emails since the original email for just this reason), essentially holding a closed-door meeting. Update: The supposed secret meeting was actually a misprint and the actual meeting date will be posted at a later date.

We have discovered that housing really wants to avoid the issue, as repeated attempts earlier this week to learn about a possible forum went unanswered. Now, the housing office has stooped to actually hanging up on students attempting to find out the truth and more information. This is unacceptable for these professionals to treat students in such a cursory manner. All these students want is to know the latest on the issue and make their voices heard. I will do my best to keep you up to date on this issue.

I encourage you, my faithful readers, to stand up for your rights in your localities, as we are attempting to do in ours. Always remember that if the other side tries to invoke Virginia Tech to remind them that criminals always break the law and that one more will not stop them.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Burn Baby, Burn: Why I support torching the Mexican flag

First off, let me say that this is not meant to attack Mexicans, but to raise awareness of the double standard with regard to flag protection as well as one creative way to protest illegal immigration. According to Fox News, David Bohmfalk was charged with burning without a permit, after burning the Mexican flag outside the Alamo in San Antonio, Texas. According to the story, Bohmfalk was angry and decided to make a statement. He noted that Americans can burn the American flag, which he argued has led to the desensitization over the act, so why not burn the Mexican flag as well.

This issue raises issues surrounding the concept of protected speech, which burning the American flag is considered. I personally feel that burning the flag should be a crime, as it is stained with the blood of countless men and women, who have fought and died to ensure that our nation would remain free. However, if the courts are going to say that burning our flag is protected, then I say burn other nation's flags as well. If this is the plan, then there is no better target to begin with than the Mexican flag.

Why the Mexican flag? Easy. All too often we see left-wing radicals burning our nation's flag while enjoying the freedoms provided by our nation. Then we see these protests about immigration with hundreds, and perhaps thousands of people who should NOT even be in this country and what are they doing besides whining about supposed rights that they have NO right to? They are flying Mexican flags, or some other Latin American nation's flag. What better way to kill two birds with one lighter, anger liberal wackos and protest illegal immigration, than to burn the Mexican flag.

David Bohmfalk started the movement in Texas. Now all that is needed is for citizens to go out and do the following:

  • purchase Mexican flags first (the other Latin American nations will come later, then the nations that stand against us, and so on)
  • acquire the proper permit (we want to do this within the law)
  • gather your friends that are like-minded
  • make sure you have a good lighter
  • finally, make sure you are near a group (and make sure your group outnumbers them) of whiny protesters either flying Mexican (or other nation/cause) flag, or burning the American flag (try to stop them if they haven't lit the flag), and light your flag, enjoying the warmth and glow of sweet counter-protesting

While this may be fun, you are expected to be respectful when lodging a successful counter-protest. Make sure you have the proper permits and stay within the law, and always treat the law enforcement officers with respect. I have read accounts of police commending counter-protesters at liberal protests, while being very angry at the liberal protesters, usually because they are disrespectful and prevent the officers from doing their jobs.

So, in conclusion, fight to protect our flag from being desecrated by hippies burning it, consider burning a Mexican flag to protest the double standard, as well as illegal immigration, and be responsible and follow the law. Finally, make sure to show your opponents that you appear to be enjoying what you are doing, as that will only pour salt in their wounds. As the Doors sang, "Come on baby, light my fire."

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Katie Couric is now part of the South Park lexicon

My apologies for leaving you all hanging, but while I was posting to The Conservative Files (Wordpress version), I forgot to simultaneously post here. If you want to see the posts between "Viva Chavez, viva comunismo", then click on the link to the Wordpress site above. I hope to remember in the future to post here when I post there.

I was watching the new episode of South Park this evening with a couple of friends and noticed that Katie Couric has become the latest "victim" of the creators. While I won't divulge the whole episode, let's just say that if Dan Rather had watched the show, he would have probably laughed heartily. The episode revolved around the competition among men to have the biggest thing around (my friend Tim wrote about this on his blog), in this case number two. While I will not go into the potty humor that was rife in this episode, I will point out that the "group" tasked with "evaluating" the size of the movement measured the weight in "Courics", which the show mentioned equals around two and a half pounds of feces.

You may be asking, Dan, why are you entering the gutter and writing about this? Simple. This show is popular with young people and I just happened to catch the reference to Couric and felt that something should be written about it. This is not to give credence to the show, as I typically do not watch it, but rather to show how two people (the show's creators) caught on to the story of the demise of The CBS Evening News with Katie Couric and turned it into comedy gold.

You may be aware, especially if you watch The O'Reilly Factor on Fox News, that the ratings of all three network news programs are suffering. While NBC is taking the largest hit, it is Couric's program that is garnering the most attention. This is likely because of the fact of her being the first woman to host a major network news program, as well as her popularity while hosting NBC's Today Show. The fact that a popular morning news personality has had so much failure at the evening slot (you know you are in trouble when Dan Rather calls your show "tarted up") is sad, as well as a perfect opportunity for South Park to strike. It is quite a double-edged sword, as while being mocked on the show could be considered a form of flattery, I doubt Ms. Couric would appreciate herself being used as a unit of measurement for excrement. We will not even touch what the episode did to Bono, as you will just have to watch.

While I do not watch Couric's show, I do feel somewhat sad for her being referenced in such a way. Yes, it is true that her ratings are low, but I would not call them crappy (pun intended), especially compared to NBC. The evening news is a dying concept, as cable news has replaced the network news, typically because younger people are not home to watch the evening news, and because of perceived liberal bias amongst the evening news programs. Now that Katie Couric has been mocked by South Park, who will be next?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Viva Chavez, viva comunismo

Well, not really, but FoxNews.com reports that Venezuelan dictator (I mean President) Hugo Chavez is seeking to change the nation’s constitution to come closer to his dream of a socialist Venezuela. There’s only one thing standing in the way of his socialist pipe dream, presidential term limits. However, when you are a dictator bent on being the next Fidel Castro and you want to get your way like a spoiled child, nothing will get in your way, even term limits, especially when your legislature is controlled by your allies.


To be sure, Chavez denies that he wants lifetime presidential powers, saying, “We know it isn’t like that. It’s power of the people,” and “I doubt there is any country on this planet with a democracy more alive than the one we enjoy in Venezuela today.”  Yeah right, come on Hugo, if it is the power of the people, why jail the people who oppose you?  What are you afraid of Hugo, a little competition?  Hey Hugo, there are several countries with more lively democracies than your tin horn dictatorship, one of them is the United States.  Oh, that’s right, you think President Bush is the devil, don’t you Hugo?  Well you were correct about the devil being in the U.N. when you made that speech, but it wasn’t Bush, it was you.  Remind me to get a hold of Charlie Daniels and have him phone Johnny so he can come down to Caracas and give you some fiddle lessons.


All humor aside now (but I do hope you enjoyed it, especially you Hugo), Chavez must be stopped.  To all Venezuelans who oppose Chavez, stand up and fight, make your case to America, and we will stand by you.  To those that support him, go to Cuba if you want socialism.  All those Hollywood elites and other liberals cuddling up to Chavez, if you like him so much, then stay there and don’t come back, as I don’t want pieces of garbage like you in my country if you are going to praise an enemy of America, while trashing your own country.  The good people of Venezuela do not need you befriending the man who has stripped them of their freedom.  To all socialists and communists either in power in Latin America or trying to seize power, remember what Ronald Reagan did to you all twenty years ago, as we can always repeat history and take you down.  It is hoped that the people of Venezuela will revolt and destroy this pathetic excuse for a leader before we do.  Remember what Protest Warrior says, “Communisms only killed 100 million people, let’s give it another chance.”

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Understanding your left-wing protesters

Have you ever been caught in a left-wing protest, checked one out out of pure curiosity, or been forcibly brought to one by one of your "progressive" friends? Were you confused about all the different types of liberal taking part? We have all been to or seen scenes of left-wing protests around our country. There are so many different groups involved, from hippies to militant gays, to college professors and actors. Not all left-wing protesters are alike. Like our own animal kingdom, there are unique species involved in the liberal protest world that, when understood and viewed in the wild (the protest itself) will bring you to a further understanding of radical left-wingers. Like understanding nature, you will need a field guide (like the Audubon guides) to identify the features, behaviors, and natural habitats, as well as their calls (more on those later). Fortunately, the founders of ProtestWarrior, a national conservative activist group that creatively and humorously crashes left-wing protests, has created a guide. A Field Guide to Left-Wing Wackos will help the intrepid conservative understand the species of protester and how to annoy them. Species one may encounter are as follows:


Anarchists-as their name suggests, these creatures advocate the abolishment of the government. They are prone to violence to get their way, as illustrated by their involvement in the 1999 WTO protests in Seattle. These "adults" often throw large versions of toddler temper tantrums when their ideas are challenged, or they don't get their way. In addition, they are too afraid of the consequences of their behavior, particularly acts of violence, so they hide under their ball caps and bandannas. Approach species with caution, as they are known to stomp and kick victims while on the ground (see tantrum remark above).


Communists-this species is similar to their Anarchist cousins, with one difference. While Anarchists call for the dissolution of the government, Communists call for the dissolution of the state, which will be replaced by a communist government. They typically view the world with sad eyes, as they face the reality that their system killed millions in the 20th century, but are quick to deny these atrocities as being communist. In order to scare communists away, bring a friend who is a refugee from communism and also bring up the movie "The Killing Fields."


Intellectuals-This species, also knowns as College Professors enjoy the privileges that come with working in academia. Besides working far less than most other Americans (summer break, spring break, Christmas break), they enjoy the fact that tenure makes them untouchable. This species is usually too self-absorbed in their worthless research to attend protests (also prefer to be low-key to keep their cushy job), but will occasionally speak at protests. Typically this species supports the protesters from the sidelines, preferring to stay in the air conditioned office and write articles of support for local print media. The Intellectual is a dangerous species that spits venom from its mouth that targets the mind with liberal poison that can turn Mom and Dad's little darling into a raving left-wing fanatic that they do not know. The worst part about an attack from an Intellectual is that it comes with the financial cost of four or more years of education.


Authors Note: Not all professors are members of this species, as there exists endangered species commonly called the Old School professor, which while liberal, still views their mission as one of educating, not indoctrinating. Old school profs. have cousins called Conservative Professors, which commonly reside at Hillsdale College or one of the other traditionally conservative schools in the country, as well as occasional positions at other schools. Unfortunately, these species are one of the few antidotes for Intellectual attacks and they are nearing extinction, as most Old Schoolers retire, and most conservatives seek other employment.


College Students-the political "offspring" of Intellectuals, College Students are willing to join in the protests and other left-wing causes to impress their Intellectual professor and keep their GPA. This species is easily confused, as their youth is their undoing. A well-studied individual can take the College Student down with shear facts, as the College Student has neither the life experience nor the frame of reference to last long in the arena of ideas, especially when challenged.


Hollywood Activists-You have to love those who attend protests from Hollywood. Members of this species are so self-absorbed that they do not particularly care about the cause, but rather want the street cred that comes from appearing with their fellow travelers. However, one thing sets this group apart, they want to keep a level of distance from the protesters, possibly for their own safety. This species is somewhat of a sad case, as they have become so deluded with their own selves that they think that every other American gives a rats you know what about their thoughts. Strategy for dealing with this species is as simple as not attending their movies.


Blacktivists-this species is comprised with, as the name suggests, angry black people. This species is convinced that all ills are the fault of white people and their inherent racism, as opposed to their own lack of initiative. Everything, from Katrina to the inability of some of them to hold a job is the white man's fault. Prominent members of this species include members of the Nation of Islam and Jesse Jackson. Ways to annoy this species include (from the book itself) highlighting the discriminatory hiring in the NBA and pointing out the prominent Democrats who opposed the Civil Rights Act.


Hacktivists-These individuals are the most elusive of all the protest species. This is mainly because the activity they engage in is typically the most illegal, which is, as their name implies, hacking. Hacktivists are characterized by their pasty complexion, due to lack of exposure to the sun, and their absolute lack of ability to get a date. They often target conservative websites to take down, or steal the financial information of site supporters. It is hoped that they will end up on the protest endangered species list due to lack of population from lack of procreation.


Proud Marys- this species is better known as the militant homosexual. You may recognize them by them either holding hands, or overt displays of sexuality, or they will be dressed in an outrageous fashion (boas, leather, next to nothing, etc.). Members of this species are proud to be gay and want the whole world to know it, whether the rest of the world wants to or not. According to the guide, strategies for staying safe when confronted by this species include reminding them of what Muslim countries do to homosexuals (especially when they are protesting for Muslim causes) and/or advocating Straight Pride.


Granolas-Also known as the "Environut" or "long-haired tree-dwelling baboon", the Granola is one of the more amusing, but sometimes dangerous members of the protest kingdom. Granolas include members of the eco-terror groups Earth Liberation Front (ELF) and Animal Liberation Front (ALF, not to be mistaken for the lovable fur ball character of 1980s TV), which are responsible for many acts of domestic terrorism and damage. Most Granolas are less harmful than their ELF/ALF brethren and are much more amusing. Granolas are typically found in trees that they feel they must protect from evil loggers (no one consulted the tree to find out how it felt about someone freeloading on its branches and using them for a bathroom). The poster child for Granolas is Julia Butterfly Hill, who lived in a tree she name Luna for over 700 days (apparently this girl does not need a job to afford housing like the rest of us, she just mooches of a poor, innocent tree). The guide suggests offering to buy PETA protesters food at the nearest burger joint and playing chain saw sounds loudly (bringing actual chainsaw encouraged for effect) at one of their "Tree Villages".


Peace Moms-She's done her share of diaper changes, PTA meetings, and bake sales. Now that the kids have left the nest, she feels she is ready to change the world (after all, she's not getting younger and has not had the eye of her husband since kid #2). The peace mom is the organizational queen (no offense to the Proud Marys above) of the protest world, which grew from her work with community events and school events when her children were younger. The guide mentions two important characteristics of Peace Moms. First, "They are by far the best smelling of all the species." (127) and that they are the most dangerous of all liberal protest species. This is because while they don't know what they are exactly doing, they manage to get things done (this comes again from their years of training with PTA and other groups when they were younger). The Peace Mom typically resides in upper-middle class neighborhoods and typically remains active until the grandkids arrive, which either brings about total retirement from protesting, or evolution into the sub-species known as Peace Grandmas. The guide recommends the following tactics for dealing with Peace Moms: Level 1, compliment her appearance and ask about workout regimen, which will cause her to drone on about it and forget what the protest is about (Peace Moms are very self-absorbed); Level 2, mention that her mascara is running, which will cause her to flee the area to reapply; and Level 3, when she comments about the evils of capitalism, ask her where her husband works. (133-4)


The Self-Hating Vet-They served their country, but left their common sense in the war zone and replaced it with radical left-wing politics. The self-hating veteran is somewhat a sad case. They served their country, which is an honorable thing, but somewhere along the line, they found drugs and lost their minds. They now find solace in their favorite brew, which is one place they hang out in. There exists a sub-species, the Ivy League Self-Hating Vet that is wealthy (examples are John Kerry and Al Gore) and uses that wealth to their advantage. Tactics for dealing with this species include directing him to the fake "Legalize Marijuana Smoke-In" to introducing him to your friend from South Vietnam.(145)


Acid Freaks-Also known as the "common hippie" are known for their unkempt appearance, goofy antics, and characteristic aroma (typically of cannabis) that is used to attract others, but not necessarily for mating. Typical Acid Freak behavior includes either playing a conga drum while rhythmically dancing to said drum during acid-induced high, hacky sack, or staring into space as they enjoy or fear the images created by said acid. According to the guide, the Acid Freak can be subdued by simply asking them to look at their hand, which will result in them looking at it for hours in the same location.(157)


Dylan Wannabes-A no talent pathetic excuse for an "artist" that, as the name implies, thinks they'll be the next Bob Dylan. Often carrying acoustic guitar and occasional harmonica, the Wannabe is ready to show their stuff (or lack of) at the next protest. These rejects could make William Hung seem like Don Henley. The guide offers no tactics, but plugging your ears and/or unplugging their microphone and amps may be in order.


Performance Artist-This species is in love with the grotesque display, which they consider art. They are easy to spot, as they are dressed like they are ready to go Trick-or-Treating. You may spot one dressed as Death, which is a likely representation of the victims of Bush's illegitimate wars, or you may spot others engaged in acts so vile, they would make a blind man cry. One example is the group Breasts not Bombs, which would be a nice distraction to the protest if the women were not examples of too much Jell-O for the mold (quoting Ron White "Things that make you go bwugh."). The guide recommends (you may not want to try it though) setting up a camera to attract the creatures, as they crave the attention, or dressing up as a suicide bomber and stand near their recreation of the Israeli security fence and go "Thank you for your support. You are now all dead"(178)


Islamothug-He's come from the ghetto of East Jerusalem ready to let his fellow travelers know that he's Muslim and angry. Members of this species blame all their own personal ills, as well as those of the world on the U.S. and Israel. Often dressing like a "gangsta" version of Yasser Arafat, they are known to engage in fake funeral processions to illustrate Israeli and American atrocities against Muslims, particularly Palestinians. They are known to refer to terrorists as freedom fighters. Tactics range from asking for translations of Koranic verses (particularly Surah 9:5) to tripping the coffin of a funeral procession, to holding up the following sign within their group and explaining the sarcasm.


pw_sign_22.gif


Closet Nazis-As the name implies, these individuals possess a high level of anti-Semitism. They attempt to hide this behind a veil of anti-Israeli views. They are also characterized by being conspiracy nuts. Ways of dealing with them include showing them a fake "Elders of Zion" membership card, which will cause them to run to white power forums, announce the finding, and be laughed at for being so stupid by other Nazis, and, wearing pro-Israeli apparel near them.(202)


Security Goons-This is a protest volunteer who handles security for the organization putting on the protest. This species annoys cops frequently by acting like they have real power wearing their security vests. Known for protecting protests from groups like ProtestWarrior, these creatures overdo this job because they have no burdens in life. Related to the Security Goons are the organizers of the protest themselves, the Goons "bosses". The guide encourages shaking the hand of the real cops safeguarding the protest for their patience and humor, confronting the Goons with the truth of the First Amendment when they attempt to tear down your sign, and picketing the office of the protest organizer for a taste of their own medicine.(211-2)


There is one more group in the guide, but it is a group to be proud of and one that does not care for the protests.


The Employed White Male-Members of this species may be liberal or conservative, but one thing holds them together, they are just trying to get to work, raise their families, and enjoy life. This species typically gets involved with protests by accident, even though they were the original protesters at the founding of our nation. The employed white male will usually be heading to work, or coming home from work and have their journey interrupted by protesters, who likely did not get out of bed until noon and have no job. The protesters serve the employed white male with a powerful example for their children of why hard work and strong values are important ("You don't want to be like them, do you kid?"). This species is to be honored and celebrated, as they are what make this country great.


Thus concludes the examination of the species covered in A Field Guide to Left-Wing Wackos. Now you will know the different groups at liberal protests and what to do about them. Please consider getting the book as it is wonderful and will make you laugh. Also, check out ProtestWarrior.com to find out ways to get involved and counter the protest (they also have downloadable signs to place on doors, desks, etc. to annoy liberals).


Author's Note: The page numbers in parenthesis correspond to the page numbers in the book where certain information in the profiles was used.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

George S. Patton on the War on Terror

FoxNews.com reported this video today and I had to share it with you. One wonders what a Patton-like general would say about our current War on Terror. Well, one person has a pretty good idea.


George S. Patton on the War on Terror

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Demise of Ward Churchill

You may remember the song of the Munch kins from "The Wizard of Oz" that went, "Ding dong the witch is dead . . ." Well Ward Churchill is not a witch and he is not dead, but today the University of Colorado finally did the right thing, they fired him. You may remember Churchill's inflammatory remarks comparing 9/11 victims to Nazi Adolph Eichmann. Beyond that, Churchill was also plagued by scandal surrounding supposed academic dishonesty. This is no surprise given his questionable academic background. First, Mr. Churchill does not have a doctorate, except for an honorary Doctor of Humane Letters, which does not count in my book. In fact, his degrees are not even in his field of teaching. Churchill earned a BA and MA in Communication from Sangamon State University, which is now the University of Illinois Springfield (UIS). How Churchill was hired as a professor and given tenure is an issue raised by Victor Davis Hanson in an online article for National Review. Churchill is but one of many examples of left-wing radicals teaching at our nation's colleges and universities that have no business teaching either because of lack of credentials, or appropriate research requirements, which would prevent more moderate or conservative persons from securing teaching positions. Many of Churchill's "fellow travelers" are chronicled in David Horrowitz's The Professors. Horrowitz is a well-known conservative activist, who was a former Communist radical in the 1960s. He now campaigns for the Academic Bill of Rights (ABOR), which seeks to protect students from radical faculty (it is opposed by such organizations as the American Historical Association). UC Boulder students can now rest easy knowing that they will never have to fear this charlatan. Hopefully, many more radical professors will go the way of Ward Churchill and conservatives can take back America's campuses.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Rep. Keith Ellison: the Shame of Minnesota and Washington

Fox News has reported that Rep. Keith Ellison, the Minnesota Democrat who sparked controversy by taking his oath on the Koran this past January is stirring up controversy again. While speaking to a group of atheists, the Muslim Congressman made remarks comparing the 9/11 terrorist attacks to the Reichstags fire of 1933 that paved the way for Adolph Hitler to seize dictatorial power in Germany. According to an article in the Minneapolis Star Tribune, the Congressman said the following, "It's almost like the Reichstag fire, kind of reminds me of that. After the Reichstag was burned, they blamed the Communists for it and it put the leader of that country [Hitler] in a position where he could basically have authority to do whatever he wanted. The fact is that I'm not saying [Sept. 11] was a [U.S.] plan, or anything like that because, you know, that's how they put you in the nut-ball box -- dismiss you." No Congressman, you are right, you are not saying that September 11 was a government plot, you are just IMPLYING it.


Ellison then said the following in a statement, "Obviously, Usama bin Laden and the hijackers who carried out the murderous events are responsible for 9/11. The question is, however, how do we respond to this tragedy? With fear and rage? Or with courage and reason? I'm for courage and reason." Ellison then added, "This means that in the aftermath of 9/11, instead of invading Iraq, President Bush should have responded militarily where necessary, but even more so, diplomatically, and with all of our intelligence resources." Mr. Ellison, where have you been the last six years, we did not go into Iraq until 2003, almost two years after 9/11. We did respond militarily where necessary, or did you forget Afghanistan?


Keith Ellison is just the latest example of Democrats using irresponsible rhetoric to suit their political agenda. They are more concerned with their party than their own country. Mr. Ellison, do the nation a favor, apologize to President Bush, apologize to all Americans, apologize to your constituents, then get out of the United States Congress until you learn to be more responsible with your words. Republicans have lost their positions for far less, which just highlights the hypocrisy of the Democratic Party.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Cindy Sheehan, Left-wing hypocrite

FoxNews.com has reported that "peace mom" Cindy Sheehan stated that she would run against Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) as an Independent unless Pelosi brings forward articles of impeachment against President Bush (read story here). There are two major problems with this story. First, the overt demand for impeachment when there are no grounds for such. Bush did not commit "high crimes and misdemeanors" as required by the Constitution for impeachment. Second, is Sheehan herself making such an inflammatory demand of Pelosi. This is the same Cindy Sheehan who recently announced she was bowing out of the anti-war movement. Well, it seems that Mother Sheehan is either a liar or a hypocrite, but likely both, as if she said she was getting out of the anti-war movement, then this announcement contradicts the earlier "retirement" announcement. Cindy, if you say you are getting out of something, do not try to slither your way into the anti-war movement by another vehicle, it is dishonest and people will figure it out.


It is quite sad in one sense to read the saga of Sheehan. One feels pity on her for the loss of her son, as well as the abuse of her by radical leftists, like Michael Moore. However, one becomes less sympathetic when they hear her refer to President Bush as a terrorist and hanging out with American enemy Hugo Chavez. Her son, Casey, is a true American hero. He fought and died for something greater than himself and something that he believed in, his country.


One positive does arise from this story that may benefit conservatives in San Fransisco. If Sheehan runs as an Independent against Pelosi, it will likely split the Left-wing voting block in SF, which could allow a conservative candidate to win. Democrats beware, not only do you face a hostile public dissatisfied with your liberal antics, as illustrated by your abysmal approval rating in Congress, but you also face the wrath of Mama Sheehan, a loose cannon of a woman who will not stop until Bush and America are toppled. One wonders what Casey thinks as he gazes down from Heaven.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12Next »